Alexander Sack wrote:
Hey Vincent:
No problem. I would love to. I have a really really stupid question.
What I've done is:
1) Checked out the 2.0.x trunk
This is not necessary, you can use a regular Maven release.
2) Built a new maven-javadoc-plugin
3) Used mvn deploy:deploy-file to install it on my test machine
To install your version of the plugin into your local repository, use
the command instead: mvn install
4) Change my project's pom file that uses javadoc to include <version>
2.4-SNAPSHOT</version>
5) Execute mvn site
6) Stair blankly at the screen as I get the can't fine 2.4-SNAPSHOT message
I've tried using the 2.0.8 stable as well as the bootstrapped
2.0.9-SNAPSHOTI built with no luck (I've even built offline (-o)). It
can't seem to find
my new javadoc plugin jar file I deployed. I noticed that
deploy:deploy-file on 2.0.8 adds a date as part of the jar file (2.0.4 did
not do this). Have snapshot deployment/handling changed? What am I doing
wrong?
Here is my deploy line:
mvn deploy:deploy-file
-Dversion=2.4-SNAPSHOT-DartifactId=maven-javadoc-plugin -DgroupId=
org.apache.maven.plugins -Dpackaging=jar -Dfile=/root/maven-
javadoc-plugin-2.4-SNAPSHOT.jar -url=file:///root/.m2/repository
Thanks!
-aps
On Feb 11, 2008 7:22 AM, Vincent Siveton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alexander,
Please open an issue, and if you want propose a patch :)
I guess that the pattern used should also work with -J-version
Vincent
2008/2/10, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Exactly. The use of "-fullversion" is really for internal use as per
Benjamin and typically the format is "java version <version>" or
something
of that elk which is very easy to parse. Again, I would rely on the
javadocVersion tag as a backup.
Thanks!
-aps
On Feb 10, 2008 3:22 PM, Benjamin Bentmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Is there any reason again why it can't use "-version?"
-version gives a lot of unuseful informations.
The unuseful information should not be a problem for the version
parsing.
On
the other hand, "-fullversion" is "for internal use only" according to
[0]
so it seems wise to switch to "-version" and rely on a
public/documentated
command line switch.
Regards,
Benjamin Bentmann
[0] http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=4127994
--
"What lies behind us and what lies in front of us is of little concern
to
what lies within us." -Ralph Waldo Emerson
--
Dennis Lundberg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
