Alexander, Please open an issue, and if you want propose a patch :) I guess that the pattern used should also work with -J-version
Vincent 2008/2/10, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Exactly. The use of "-fullversion" is really for internal use as per > Benjamin and typically the format is "java version <version>" or something > of that elk which is very easy to parse. Again, I would rely on the > javadocVersion tag as a backup. > Thanks! > > -aps > > On Feb 10, 2008 3:22 PM, Benjamin Bentmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > >> Is there any reason again why it can't use "-version?" > > >> > > > > > > -version gives a lot of unuseful informations. > > > > The unuseful information should not be a problem for the version parsing. > > On > > the other hand, "-fullversion" is "for internal use only" according to [0] > > so it seems wise to switch to "-version" and rely on a public/documentated > > command line switch. > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Benjamin Bentmann > > > > > > [0] http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=4127994 > > > > > > > -- > "What lies behind us and what lies in front of us is of little concern to > what lies within us." -Ralph Waldo Emerson > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
