Hi,
I have start a proposal [1]

Thanks for comments,
--
Olivier

[1] 
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Resources+Handling+(common+component+maven-filtering)

2008/3/1, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'll write something up about the ordering of processing in the wiki
>  so that we don't lose it in the ether. Probably won't happen today but
>  later Sunday night.
>
>
>  On 1-Mar-08, at 5:52 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>
>  > Jason,
>  > Have you found some time to look ?
>  > I have created a resources plugin branch [1] which use the new
>  > component.
>  >
>  > Thanks,
>  > --
>  > Olivier
>  >
>  > [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/plugins/branches/MRESOURCES-56/
>  >
>  >
>  > 2008/2/28, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>  >> You just have to make sure that the processing order that happens in
>  >> the resource plugin matches what would happen with processing of only
>  >> execution properties in the CLI/Embedder. I can take a look tomorrow
>  >> or grab me on IRC or I'll forget. I'm in one of my lose track of time
>  >> modes.
>  >>
>  >>
>  >> On 28-Feb-08, at 4:25 AM, Stephane Nicoll wrote:
>  >>
>  >>> I agree with you Olivier. Now I don't know the internals of the
>  >>> embedder. Jason, what do you think?
>  >>>
>  >>> Stéphane
>  >>>
>  >>> On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 11:06 PM, Olivier Lamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  >>> wrote:
>  >>>> 2008/2/24, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>  >>>>>
>  >>>>
>  >>>>> On 24-Feb-08, at 10:35 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>  >>>>>
>  >>>>>> Hi,
>  >>>>>> Just to be sure mavenSession.getExecutionProperties() should be
>  >>>>>> use.
>  >>>>>
>  >>>>>
>  >>>>> Yes, system properties are turned into execution properties in the
>  >>>>> CLI
>  >>>>> and pushed into the session. So that from the embedder each
>  >>>>> invocation
>  >>>>> can have it's own session and isolate execution properties. We
>  >>>>> just
>  >>>>> need to try and keep this use case in mind as I see use inside the
>  >>>>> IDEs starting to match the use from the command line in the next
>  >>>>> year.
>  >>>>>
>  >>>>> We just need to determine the precedence universally and take the
>  >>>>> values from the core instead of each plugin fiddling around with
>  >>>>> system properties directly. I was currently thinking that
>  >>>>> properties
>  >>>>> in the POM are looked at first and then overridden with execution
>  >>>>> properties. Where execution properties have system properties
>  >>>>> which
>  >>>>> can be overridden by CLI parameters. Currently system properties
>  >>>>> in
>  >>>>> trunk are not neutered because when I did that a bunch of things
>  >>>>> broke, mostly proxy related plugins. But this is the plan that I
>  >>>>> had
>  >>>>> in might. If we centralize all the code we can decide ultimately
>  >>>>> what
>  >>>>> the order of precedence is. But plugins fiddling with this is a
>  >>>>> bad
>  >>>>> pattern we have to avoid.
>  >>>>>
>  >>>>
>  >>>> I have changed System.getProperties to
>  >>>> mavenSession.executionProperties.
>  >>>>
>  >>>> Now we have to agree on the properties loading order.
>  >>>> If I look at the current maven-resources-plugin implementation
>  >>>> which
>  >>>> use System props and not mavenSession.executionProperties, this
>  >>>> ones
>  >>>> doesn't win.
>  >>>> IMHO, it's not correct because the user must wins with a cli input.
>  >>>> The component (maven-filtering) use the order defined in the
>  >>>> documentation [1].
>  >>>>
>  >>>> WDYT ?
>  >>>>
>  >>>> Thanks,
>  >>>> --
>  >>>> Olivier
>  >>>>
>  >>>> [1] http://people.apache.org/~olamy/staging-sites/maven-
>  >>>> filtering/ .
>  >>>>
>  >>>>
>  >>>>
>  >>>>
>  >>>>
>  >>>>>
>  >>>>>> Right ?
>  >>>>>>
>  >>>>>> Thanks,
>  >>>>>> --
>  >>>>>> Olivier
>  >>>>>>
>  >>>>>> 2008/2/24, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>  >>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>> On 24-Feb-08, at 12:36 AM, Stephane Nicoll wrote:
>  >>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>> I just hit the problem today with one of my colleague. Yes,
>  >>>>>>>> System
>  >>>>>>>> props should definitely win.
>  >>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>> You also must start thinking about how system properties make it
>  >>>>>>> into
>  >>>>>>> the execution environment. System properties wreak havoc in the
>  >>>>>>> embedder and so you should never be dealing with System
>  >>>>>>> properties
>  >>>>>>> directly in any plugin. Never. The change has been made in trunk
>  >>>>>>> and I
>  >>>>>>> can see if that change was propagated back to the branch but
>  >>>>>>> System
>  >>>>>>> properties should get turned into execution properties (a simple
>  >>>>>>> properties) that multiple threads being executed don't get
>  >>>>>>> nailed
>  >>>>>>> by a
>  >>>>>>> globally set system property.
>  >>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>> Thanks,
>  >>>>>>>> Stéphane
>  >>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>> On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 11:28 PM, Olivier Lamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >>>>>>>> >
>  >>>>>>>> wrote:
>  >>>>>>>>> Now the question is "do we have to change this order ?".
>  >>>>>>>>> Have a look at MRESOURCES-39 [1].
>  >>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>> Users complains about system properties (-D in the mvn cli)
>  >>>>>>>>> doesn't
>  >>>>>>>>> win.
>  >>>>>>>>> IMHO, system props should wins.
>  >>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>> This was the case with maven1 [2].
>  >>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>> Thougths ?
>  >>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>  >>>>>>>>> --
>  >>>>>>>>> Olivier
>  >>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>> [1] http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRESOURCES-39
>  >>>>>>>>> [2] http://maven.apache.org/maven-1.x/reference/
>  >>>>>>>>> properties.html
>  >>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>> 2008/2/19, Olivier Lamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>  >>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>> Yep sure.
>  >>>>>>>>>> Currently, the new component use the same strategy as the
>  >>>>>>>>>> maven-resources-plugin.
>  >>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>> --
>  >>>>>>>>>> Olivier
>  >>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>> 2008/2/19, Stephane Nicoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>  >>>>>>>>>>> I guess we should have a look to the way this is done
>  >>>>>>>>>>> currently
>  >>>>>>>>>>> to
>  >>>>>>>>>>> avoid breaking the backward compat.
>  >>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 19, 2008 11:30 AM, Olivier Lamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>  >>>>>>>>>>>> Sure, could be better.
>  >>>>>>>>>>>> But we have to agree on the order :
>  >>>>>>>>>>>> * System Properties
>  >>>>>>>>>>>> * pom.properties
>  >>>>>>>>>>>> * List of properties ( the method has a parameter which
>  >>>>>>>>>>>> accept a
>  >>>>>>>>>>>> List
>  >>>>>>>>>>>> of String -> path properties files ) (war plugin use it to
>  >>>>>>>>>>>> pass
>  >>>>>>>>>>>> a list
>  >>>>>>>>>>>> of properties file).
>  >>>>>>>>>>>> * pom.filters
>  >>>>>>>>>>>> * pom.build.filters
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>> ?
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>> --
>  >>>>>>>>>>>> Olivier
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>> 2008/2/19, Stephane Nicoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>> This one was very much expected, thanks for doing this.
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>> However, I think that we should use a first-win strategy,
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>> otherwise
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>> there is no way to control the actual value of a property.
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>> First-win
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>> strategy is mainly used everywhere in the war plugin and
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>> ease a
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>> lot of
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>> stuff
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there any reason you choose doing this?
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>> Stéphane
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 19, 2008 10:17 AM, Olivier Lamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> As you know some plugins made some filtering base on the
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> code
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> coming
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> from the maven-resources-plugin.
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> This means there are some copy and paste from the
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> resources
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> plugin
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> source to other plugins.
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To prevent this, the code from  the resources plugin has
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> been
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> put in a
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> plexus component (currently in shared sandbox [1]).
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> A documentation has been started [2].
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It has been integrated in the maven-war-plugin trunk.
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Before calling a vote on a first alpha-1 release, I'd
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> like to
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> have
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> some comments/thoughts on it.
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The final goal of this component should be : using it in
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> plugins
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> which need filtering.
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Olivier
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] : 
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/sandbox/trunk/shared/maven-filtering/
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] : 
> http://people.apache.org/~olamy/staging-sites/maven-filtering/
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>> Large Systems Suck: This rule is 100% transitive. If you
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>> build
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>> one,
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>> you suck" -- S.Yegge
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>> --
>  >>>>>>>>>>> Large Systems Suck: This rule is 100% transitive. If you
>  >>>>>>>>>>> build
>  >>>>>>>>>>> one,
>  >>>>>>>>>>> you suck" -- S.Yegge
>  >>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>> --
>  >>>>>>>> Large Systems Suck: This rule is 100% transitive. If you build
>  >>>>>>>> one,
>  >>>>>>>> you suck" -- S.Yegge
>  >>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>> Thanks,
>  >>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>> Jason
>  >>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>  >>>>>>> Jason van Zyl
>  >>>>>>> Founder,  Apache Maven
>  >>>>>>> jason at sonatype dot com
>  >>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>  >>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>> We all have problems. How we deal with them is a measure of our
>  >>>>>>> worth.
>  >>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>> -- Unknown
>  >>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>
>  >>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >>>>>>
>  >>>>>
>  >>>>> Thanks,
>  >>>>>
>  >>>>> Jason
>  >>>>>
>  >>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>  >>>>> Jason van Zyl
>  >>>>> Founder,  Apache Maven
>  >>>>> jason at sonatype dot com
>  >>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>  >>>>>
>  >>>>>
>  >>>>> A party which is not afraid of letting culture,
>  >>>>> business, and welfare go to ruin completely can
>  >>>>> be omnipotent for a while.
>  >>>>>
>  >>>>> -- Jakob Burckhardt
>  >>>>>
>  >>>>>
>  >>>>>
>  >>>>>
>  >>>>>
>  >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >>>>>
>  >>>>>
>  >>>>
>  >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >>>>
>  >>>>
>  >>>
>  >>>
>  >>>
>  >>> --
>  >>> Large Systems Suck: This rule is 100% transitive. If you build one,
>  >>> you suck" -- S.Yegge
>  >>>
>  >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >>>
>  >>
>  >> Thanks,
>  >>
>  >> Jason
>  >>
>  >> ----------------------------------------------------------
>  >> Jason van Zyl
>  >> Founder,  Apache Maven
>  >> jason at sonatype dot com
>  >> ----------------------------------------------------------
>  >>
>  >>
>  >> Simplex sigillum veri. (Simplicity is the seal of truth.)
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >>
>  >>
>  >
>  > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >
>
>  Thanks,
>
>  Jason
>
>  ----------------------------------------------------------
>  Jason van Zyl
>  Founder,  Apache Maven
>  jason at sonatype dot com
>  ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Our achievements speak for themselves. What we have to keep track
>  of are our failures, discouragements and doubts. We tend to forget
>  the past difficulties, the many false starts, and the painful
>  groping. We see our past achievements as the end result of a
>  clean forward thrust, and our present difficulties as
>  signs of decline and decay.
>
>  -- Eric Hoffer, Reflections on the Human Condition
>
>
>
>
>
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to