I agree with you Olivier. Now I don't know the internals of the
embedder. Jason, what do you think?

Stéphane

On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 11:06 PM, Olivier Lamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/2/24, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>  >
>
> >  On 24-Feb-08, at 10:35 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>  >
>  >  > Hi,
>  >  > Just to be sure mavenSession.getExecutionProperties() should be use.
>  >
>  >
>  > Yes, system properties are turned into execution properties in the CLI
>  >  and pushed into the session. So that from the embedder each invocation
>  >  can have it's own session and isolate execution properties. We just
>  >  need to try and keep this use case in mind as I see use inside the
>  >  IDEs starting to match the use from the command line in the next year.
>  >
>  >  We just need to determine the precedence universally and take the
>  >  values from the core instead of each plugin fiddling around with
>  >  system properties directly. I was currently thinking that properties
>  >  in the POM are looked at first and then overridden with execution
>  >  properties. Where execution properties have system properties which
>  >  can be overridden by CLI parameters. Currently system properties in
>  >  trunk are not neutered because when I did that a bunch of things
>  >  broke, mostly proxy related plugins. But this is the plan that I had
>  >  in might. If we centralize all the code we can decide ultimately what
>  >  the order of precedence is. But plugins fiddling with this is a bad
>  >  pattern we have to avoid.
>  >
>
>  I have changed System.getProperties to mavenSession.executionProperties.
>
>  Now we have to agree on the properties loading order.
>  If I look at the current maven-resources-plugin implementation which
>  use System props and not mavenSession.executionProperties, this ones
>  doesn't win.
>  IMHO, it's not correct because the user must wins with a cli input.
>  The component (maven-filtering) use the order defined in the documentation 
> [1].
>
>  WDYT ?
>
>  Thanks,
>  --
>  Olivier
>
>  [1] http://people.apache.org/~olamy/staging-sites/maven-filtering/ .
>
>
>
>
>
>  >
>  >  > Right ?
>  >  >
>  >  > Thanks,
>  >  > --
>  >  > Olivier
>  >  >
>  >  > 2008/2/24, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>  >  >>
>  >  >> On 24-Feb-08, at 12:36 AM, Stephane Nicoll wrote:
>  >  >>
>  >  >>> I just hit the problem today with one of my colleague. Yes, System
>  >  >>> props should definitely win.
>  >  >>>
>  >  >>
>  >  >>
>  >  >> You also must start thinking about how system properties make it into
>  >  >> the execution environment. System properties wreak havoc in the
>  >  >> embedder and so you should never be dealing with System properties
>  >  >> directly in any plugin. Never. The change has been made in trunk
>  >  >> and I
>  >  >> can see if that change was propagated back to the branch but System
>  >  >> properties should get turned into execution properties (a simple
>  >  >> properties) that multiple threads being executed don't get nailed
>  >  >> by a
>  >  >> globally set system property.
>  >  >>
>  >  >>
>  >  >>> Thanks,
>  >  >>> Stéphane
>  >  >>>
>  >  >>> On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 11:28 PM, Olivier Lamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  >  >>> wrote:
>  >  >>>> Now the question is "do we have to change this order ?".
>  >  >>>> Have a look at MRESOURCES-39 [1].
>  >  >>>>
>  >  >>>> Users complains about system properties (-D in the mvn cli) doesn't
>  >  >>>> win.
>  >  >>>> IMHO, system props should wins.
>  >  >>>>
>  >  >>>> This was the case with maven1 [2].
>  >  >>>>
>  >  >>>> Thougths ?
>  >  >>>>
>  >  >>>> Thanks,
>  >  >>>> --
>  >  >>>> Olivier
>  >  >>>>
>  >  >>>> [1] http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRESOURCES-39
>  >  >>>> [2] http://maven.apache.org/maven-1.x/reference/properties.html
>  >  >>>>
>  >  >>>> 2008/2/19, Olivier Lamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>  >  >>>>
>  >  >>>>
>  >  >>>>> Yep sure.
>  >  >>>>> Currently, the new component use the same strategy as the
>  >  >>>>> maven-resources-plugin.
>  >  >>>>>
>  >  >>>>>
>  >  >>>>> --
>  >  >>>>> Olivier
>  >  >>>>>
>  >  >>>>> 2008/2/19, Stephane Nicoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>  >  >>>>>> I guess we should have a look to the way this is done currently
>  >  >>>>>> to
>  >  >>>>>> avoid breaking the backward compat.
>  >  >>>>>>
>  >  >>>>>> On Feb 19, 2008 11:30 AM, Olivier Lamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >  >>>>>>> Sure, could be better.
>  >  >>>>>>> But we have to agree on the order :
>  >  >>>>>>> * System Properties
>  >  >>>>>>> * pom.properties
>  >  >>>>>>> * List of properties ( the method has a parameter which accept a
>  >  >>>>>>> List
>  >  >>>>>>> of String -> path properties files ) (war plugin use it to pass
>  >  >>>>>>> a list
>  >  >>>>>>> of properties file).
>  >  >>>>>>> * pom.filters
>  >  >>>>>>> * pom.build.filters
>  >  >>>>>>>
>  >  >>>>>>> ?
>  >  >>>>>>>
>  >  >>>>>>> --
>  >  >>>>>>> Olivier
>  >  >>>>>>>
>  >  >>>>>>>
>  >  >>>>>>> 2008/2/19, Stephane Nicoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>  >  >>>>>>>
>  >  >>>>>>>> This one was very much expected, thanks for doing this.
>  >  >>>>>>>>
>  >  >>>>>>>> However, I think that we should use a first-win strategy,
>  >  >>>>>>>> otherwise
>  >  >>>>>>>> there is no way to control the actual value of a property.
>  >  >>>>>>>> First-win
>  >  >>>>>>>> strategy is mainly used everywhere in the war plugin and ease a
>  >  >>>>>>>> lot of
>  >  >>>>>>>> stuff
>  >  >>>>>>>>
>  >  >>>>>>>> Is there any reason you choose doing this?
>  >  >>>>>>>>
>  >  >>>>>>>> Thanks,
>  >  >>>>>>>> Stéphane
>  >  >>>>>>>>
>  >  >>>>>>>>
>  >  >>>>>>>> On Feb 19, 2008 10:17 AM, Olivier Lamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  >  >>>>>>>> wrote:
>  >  >>>>>>>>> Hi,
>  >  >>>>>>>>> As you know some plugins made some filtering base on the code
>  >  >>>>>>>>> coming
>  >  >>>>>>>>> from the maven-resources-plugin.
>  >  >>>>>>>>> This means there are some copy and paste from the resources
>  >  >>>>>>>>> plugin
>  >  >>>>>>>>> source to other plugins.
>  >  >>>>>>>>> To prevent this, the code from  the resources plugin has been
>  >  >>>>>>>>> put in a
>  >  >>>>>>>>> plexus component (currently in shared sandbox [1]).
>  >  >>>>>>>>> A documentation has been started [2].
>  >  >>>>>>>>> It has been integrated in the maven-war-plugin trunk.
>  >  >>>>>>>>> Before calling a vote on a first alpha-1 release, I'd like to
>  >  >>>>>>>>> have
>  >  >>>>>>>>> some comments/thoughts on it.
>  >  >>>>>>>>>
>  >  >>>>>>>>> The final goal of this component should be : using it in all
>  >  >>>>>>>>> plugins
>  >  >>>>>>>>> which need filtering.
>  >  >>>>>>>>>
>  >  >>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>  >  >>>>>>>>> --
>  >  >>>>>>>>> Olivier
>  >  >>>>>>>>>
>  >  >>>>>>>>> [1] : 
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/sandbox/trunk/shared/maven-filtering/
>  >  >>>>>>>>> [2] : 
> http://people.apache.org/~olamy/staging-sites/maven-filtering/
>  >  >>>>>>>>>
>  >  >>>>>>>>> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >  >>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  >>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  >>>>>>>>>
>  >  >>>>>>>>>
>  >  >>>>>>>>
>  >  >>>>>>>>
>  >  >>>>>>>>
>  >  >>>>>>>> --
>  >  >>>>>>>> Large Systems Suck: This rule is 100% transitive. If you build
>  >  >>>>>>>> one,
>  >  >>>>>>>> you suck" -- S.Yegge
>  >  >>>>>>>>
>  >  >>>>>>>> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >  >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  >>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  >>>>>>>>
>  >  >>>>>>>>
>  >  >>>>>>>
>  >  >>>>>>> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >  >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  >>>>>>>
>  >  >>>>>>>
>  >  >>>>>>
>  >  >>>>>>
>  >  >>>>>>
>  >  >>>>>> --
>  >  >>>>>> Large Systems Suck: This rule is 100% transitive. If you build
>  >  >>>>>> one,
>  >  >>>>>> you suck" -- S.Yegge
>  >  >>>>>>
>  >  >>>>>> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >  >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  >>>>>>
>  >  >>>>>>
>  >  >>>>>
>  >  >>>>
>  >  >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >  >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  >>>>
>  >  >>>>
>  >  >>>
>  >  >>>
>  >  >>>
>  >  >>> --
>  >  >>> Large Systems Suck: This rule is 100% transitive. If you build one,
>  >  >>> you suck" -- S.Yegge
>  >  >>>
>  >  >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >  >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  >>>
>  >  >>
>  >  >>
>  >  >> Thanks,
>  >  >>
>  >  >> Jason
>  >  >>
>  >  >> ----------------------------------------------------------
>  >  >> Jason van Zyl
>  >  >> Founder,  Apache Maven
>  >  >> jason at sonatype dot com
>  >  >> ----------------------------------------------------------
>  >  >>
>  >  >> We all have problems. How we deal with them is a measure of our
>  >  >> worth.
>  >  >>
>  >  >> -- Unknown
>  >  >>
>  >  >>
>  >  >>
>  >  >>
>  >  >>
>  >  >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >  >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  >>
>  >  >>
>  >  >
>  >  > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >  > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  >
>  >
>  >  Thanks,
>  >
>  >  Jason
>  >
>  >  ----------------------------------------------------------
>  >  Jason van Zyl
>  >  Founder,  Apache Maven
>  >  jason at sonatype dot com
>  >  ----------------------------------------------------------
>  >
>  >
>  > A party which is not afraid of letting culture,
>  >  business, and welfare go to ruin completely can
>  >  be omnipotent for a while.
>  >
>  >  -- Jakob Burckhardt
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >
>  >
>
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>



-- 
Large Systems Suck: This rule is 100% transitive. If you build one,
you suck" -- S.Yegge

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to