David, I deployed a new snapshot, can you give that a try and make sure it's all OK?
> - I can't get a blank line in between the project name and the notice Fixed > - I can't configure projectName in a suitable place so it shows up in > the generated NOTICE. In the configuration for the remote-resources plugin, add something like: <properties> <projectName>Apache CXF</projectName> </properties> Dan On Thursday 13 March 2008, David Jencks wrote: > As I noted in a previous thread the current NOTICE files generated by > the apache-jar-resource-bundle 1.3 are not consistent with apache > policy. After some discussion on legal-discuss I've come up with a > bundle that no one seems to be able to find anything seriously wrong > with: we're starting to use it in geronimo. > > Aside from possible use by other projects I'd like to use this in an > upcoming ApacheDS release, so getting it quickly into a more neutral > location would be desirable. I've opened http://jira.codehaus.org/ > browse/MRRESOURCES-32 and attached a patch. > > The basic idea is that the NOTICE file contains only the required > apache notice, with no extra text, explanation, horizontal rules, or > anything else. Additional required notices can be put in a NOTICE > file in appended-resources and automatically appended. Dependencies > are listed in an additional generated DEPENDENCIES file, by > organization, and listing the license. > > Note that NOTICE files apply only to the exact contents of the jar in > question, not to any dependencies that might be necessary to actually > use the jar. For work at apache the normal situation is that the > minimal NOTICE is all that is required, and if more is needed its > going to be because of some special historical circumstances that > can't plausibly be tracked by maven, so explicitly recording this > information in a human-written additional NOTICE file is quite > appropriate. > > There is certainly scope for some kind of aggregating bundle for > assemblies that do actually contain stuff from other artifacts, such > as wars, ears, tar.gzs, etc, but these are pretty clearly an entirely > separate use case and likely to require considerably more work to get > right. I think starting work on a separate bundle for these might be > appropriate. > > I know of two problems in the patch, both in NOTICE.vm, and I haven't > been able to figure out solutions to either: > > - I can't get a blank line in between the project name and the notice > - I can't configure projectName in a suitable place so it shows up in > the generated NOTICE. > > Despite these problems I think this proposal is clearly more in line > with apache policy and hope it can be accepted and released quickly. > > Many thanks > david jencks > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- J. Daniel Kulp Principal Engineer, IONA [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.dankulp.com/blog --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]