> This idea with the warning was also proposed by two or three users on the > list, especially Hervé put it nicely [0]. I took this happily up because I > (still) believe that having builds out there which implicitly rely on the > platform encoding and as such just break with the ideals of > platform-independence and build reproducibility is nothing that should be > promoted, not in general and in particular not by Maven. And I consider > silent acceptance as a mild form of promotion.
Maven is an opinionated piece of software. Let the PMC decide what their opinion is on this matter and then let it be implemented. My personal opinion is that file encoding should be consciously considered and declared, and as such warning is most appropriate rather than simply info. I could be talked into accepting an info that has "build not fully reproducible etc" text in it, but this is splitting hairs. Wayne --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
