On 19-May-08, at 2:28 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
On 20/05/2008, at 7:23 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 19-May-08, at 2:38 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
Yeah, same problem.
It does appear this was the change I was referring to (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=642223
). I hadn't anticipated the direct use of classes from a wagon
implementation, just the API. Sorry!
I'll look into the possibility of changing the filters for
extensions vs plugins.
Wouldn't be easier, and safer, to roll that change back?
I was going to suggest that as one of the alternatives, yes. But
that would also mean you can't use a different version of the
bundled wagons at all. I'd rather take a closer look at the change
first.
We have been releasing significantly faster with the last couple
releases, and if Wagon remains compatible why would you need to use a
different version? Making changes to the artifact filtering is pretty
risky business in 2.0.x.
- Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
Jason
----------------------------------------------------------
Jason van Zyl
Founder, Apache Maven
jason at sonatype dot com
----------------------------------------------------------
happiness is like a butterfly: the more you chase it, the more it will
elude you, but if you turn your attention to other things, it will come
and sit softly on your shoulder ...
-- Thoreau
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
