Hi Mauro, Mauro Talevi wrote: > John Casey wrote: >> I've checked the maven core and plugins builds, and they're both >> running around 30s longer than with 2.0.9, with slightly less memory >> consumption. Other builds I've tried are running nearer to +15s over >> 2.0.9. >> > > Here's a benchmark done on a sizeable project:
well, it seems not of reasonable enough size ... hehehe > 2.0.9 > [INFO] Total time: 3 minutes 26 seconds > [INFO] Finished at: Tue Aug 05 09:11:06 BST 2008 > [INFO] Final Memory: 62M/134M > > 2.0.10-RC5 > [INFO] Total time: 4 minutes 16 seconds > [INFO] Finished at: Tue Aug 05 09:06:49 BST 2008 > [INFO] Final Memory: 58M/135M > > So a 20% increase on the original time - which is acceptable > IMO for the > sake of reproducibility. Certainly not a 300% increase. > >> Granted, these aren't huge builds, but neither are they the 3X time >> increase over 2.0.9 that others are reporting. Can we live with this >> performance issue through 2.0.10, and try to find a better way around >> for 2.0.11? > > I would be inclined to say yes - and if someone hit these huge > performance problems, could they stay on 2.0.9 until 2.0.11 came out > with the fix? Basically we have currently no pressure to switch, M209 runs fine so far. - Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
