+0 In both cases I'll subscribe to these mailing lists and will continue to read them. Perhaps it can ease rules in mail clients
Arnaud On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 9:59 AM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Any other opinions? > > > On 08/08/2008, at 6:26 PM, Mark Hobson wrote: > > 2008/8/8 Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >>> I was poking back through the archives for a couple of things related to >>> Maven core and was having trouble since it was drowned out in plugin >>> development discussion and votes. >>> >>> Considering plugin dev occurs on more on the stable basis of previous >>> versions of Maven it seemed to make some sense to use separate lists, >>> even >>> if the audience is largely similar. For commits I already filter the >>> various >>> pieces into separate folders, but that isn't as easy with dev traffic. >>> >>> This isn't a huge urge, I just wanted to see if it was something others >>> had >>> already been thinking was a good idea? >>> >> >> +1 >> >> We do that for the mojo plugins, so indeed why not for the core >> plugins too. Anything to help manage the vast Maven traffic gets my >> vote :) >> >> Mark >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > -- > Brett Porter > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/ > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- .......................................................... Arnaud HERITIER .......................................................... OCTO Technology - aheritier AT octo DOT com www.octo.com | blog.octo.com .......................................................... ASF - aheritier AT apache DOT org www.apache.org | maven.apache.org ...........................................................
