+0
If we do it, we should also split the issues and notifications.
Brett Porter wrote:
Any other opinions?
On 08/08/2008, at 6:26 PM, Mark Hobson wrote:
2008/8/8 Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I was poking back through the archives for a couple of things related to
Maven core and was having trouble since it was drowned out in plugin
development discussion and votes.
Considering plugin dev occurs on more on the stable basis of previous
versions of Maven it seemed to make some sense to use separate lists,
even
if the audience is largely similar. For commits I already filter the
various
pieces into separate folders, but that isn't as easy with dev traffic.
This isn't a huge urge, I just wanted to see if it was something
others had
already been thinking was a good idea?
+1
We do that for the mojo plugins, so indeed why not for the core
plugins too. Anything to help manage the vast Maven traffic gets my
vote :)
Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Dennis Lundberg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
