I'm trying to run the CXF build on Hudson right now with a RC10
snapshot, so hopefully I can find out why your times are so far off in
CXF...
I adjusted a few things last night to try to streamline the
concretization for aggregators and users of reactor projects. When I was
done, the full build for maven's core (mvn -Prelease,reports clean
install site) only took 2 minutes longer than the 13-minute 2.0.9 build...
I'm wondering what circumstances are present in the CXF build that throw
that one so wide of where 2.0.9 lands.
-john
Daniel Kulp wrote:
Just another quick note...
Our -Pfastinstall profile (to build/install as fast as possible)
2.0.9:
[INFO] Total time: 32 seconds
[INFO] Finished at: Mon Aug 18 21:51:07 EDT 2008
[INFO] Final Memory: 53M/94M
2.0.10-RC9:
[INFO] Total time: 4 minutes 39 seconds
[INFO] Finished at: Mon Aug 18 21:56:04 EDT 2008
[INFO] Final Memory: 77M/145M
I was just going to mention the memory thing as well. However, my MAVEN_OPTS
are set at:
MAVEN_OPTS=-XX:MaxPermSize=192m -Xmx512M
so it definitely had plenty of memory to play with.
This is cxf trunk:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/trunk/
mvn -Pfastinstall
Dan
On Monday 18 August 2008 9:05:35 pm Daniel Kulp wrote:
John,
The performance issue is back:
For CXF/tunk:
mvn install -Pdeploy,everything,nochecks
2.0.9:
Total time: 8 minutes 35 seconds
2.0.10-RC9:
Total time: 19 minutes
Dan
On Monday 18 August 2008 2:48:36 pm John Casey wrote:
Hi everyone,
As you're probably aware, we've been working for some time to stabilize
Maven for the 2.0.10 release. After quite a bit of testing in the
development community - and 8 release candidates - it looks like we
finally have a candidate that is free of regressions and stable. You can
download it here:
http://people.apache.org/~jdcasey/apache-maven/2.0.10-RC9/org/apache/mave
n/ apache-maven/2.0.10-RC9
While it does seem that all of our builds are happy with the new release
candidate, we'd like to get your feedback on it before we finalize
things. This will help us respond to any regressions or critical issues
we may have missed BEFORE we do the release, instead of having to put up
with major flaws for another release cycle.
Please, if you have the time, take 2.0.10-RC9 for a spin and tell us
what you think!
Thanks,
-john
P.S. To see the list of issues that were closed for this release (so
far), check out:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&styleNam
e= Html&version=14112
--
John Casey
Developer, PMC Member - Apache Maven (http://maven.apache.org)
Blog: http://www.ejlife.net/blogs/buildchimp/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
