heh, I think you just went and changed my mind. :)
Good point!
Either way the vote goes this is a good reason to keep pushing along
with small feature sets.
- Brett
On 30/08/2008, at 1:55 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 8:54 AM, Ralph Goers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
I would like to point out that if we go with option 1 then the
lifespan of
2.1.x will almost certainly be very short.
This might not actually be a bad thing. The archives are full of
"Maven 2.1" discussions that now belong to 3.0. If we moved on to 2.2
quickly, that would be less confusing.
--
Wendy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
