I added a reference to the prototype I did earlier in the year for the
attribute based POMs that did this using modello and stax.
I also added simplified POM syntax to the milestones for this as a
placeholder.
- Brett
On 04/09/2008, at 8:14 AM, John Casey wrote:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Maven+2.2.0+Release+Plan
Brian Fox wrote:
Sounds good to me
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 3, 2008, at 5:35 PM, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Let's start another page for 2.2 features, since this one is in
the pre-planning stages still. Until we have a concrete strategy
for implementation including a design doc, I don't feel
comfortable putting it on such a near time horizon.
WDYT?
Brian E. Fox wrote:
The only thing I feel we need to start looking at soon is an xml
parser
that can deal with newer models and not freak. This is probably
related
in some way to the refactoring happening in 3.0... but I know
that 2.0.x
can't handle newer models and the sooner we start moving to a more
flexible parser, the easier the eventual migration to 3.0 will be.
I'm not sure this needs to be in 2.1, but maybe on the list for
2.2.
-----Original Message-----
From: John Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday,
September 03, 2008 2:31 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: Maven 2.1.0 GA Plan
I've included this as M2 to give us a clean base in M1:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Maven+2.1.0+Release+Plan
Let me know what you think.
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
John Casey wrote:
Hi everyone,
So, it seems that we're all in agreement about the rough
outline for
2.1.x and beyond. I've renamed the current RC branch to be
2.1.0-M1-RC
to make this the first milestone toward some as-yet-undetermined
feature
list for 2.1.0.
So, let's talk about that feature list. From earlier comments,
I've
gathered that the following may be good targets to include for
2.1.0:
- Dan's reactor changes
- Parallel downloads
- PGP stuff
- MNG-624 and related issues/feature enhancements (parent
versioning,
right?)
What I don't know is what state of maturity each of these is
in, and
on
what timeline they can be stabilized. Do the relevant
developers have
enough time to finish implementing, testing, and documenting each
feature, so we could get a 2.1.0 GA out in, say 6 weeks or so?
Maybe
a
better approach would be to try for a new milestone release that
contains the final result of each new feature (with latent
parts of
the
rest, as we work on them), such that the 2.1.0 GA will contain
all
the
new features in their complete forms, with any regressions
identified
fixed and incorporated?
I haven't found the pertinent Confluence pages describing the
above
features yet...maybe they don't exist or maybe I haven't looked
hard
enough yet, but we'll need to collect the list somewhere that
we can
make it public going forward, and then publish that release
plan URL
on
the Maven site.
Are there other things that we can fit into this sort of
timeframe?
Is
this too much? It's my strong preference that we try to cap this
release
cycle at two months, so I guess this means taking the list of
"nearly
there" features and determining whether we'll have the time to
stabilize
them for inclusion, given our current availability.
With a timeframe of 2 months I would like to see Doxia beta-1
included
in the core. This is tracked in JIRA as
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3602
In the discussions surrounding that issue it was determined there
would
not be enough exposure of Doxia beta-1 until the next release
(at that
time). But with the new timeframe for the 2.1 release we should be
able
to get good testing of Doxia beta-1.
Of course, once we settle the 2.1.0 release plan, we can start
talking
about what we're going to do for 2.2, 2.3, etc. As long as we
keep
things rolling, there's no reason anyone needs to feel overly
rushed
about getting a particular feature in a particular release...it
should
NOT be your only chance. :-)
What does anyone else think?
-john
--
John Casey
Developer, PMC Member - Apache Maven (http://maven.apache.org)
Blog: http://www.ejlife.net/blogs/buildchimp/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
John Casey
Developer, PMC Member - Apache Maven (http://maven.apache.org)
Blog: http://www.ejlife.net/blogs/buildchimp/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]