On 22-Sep-08, at 2:14 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Brett Porter wrote:
I would prefer core-it-suite to core-its, but it's a small thing.
So we would have core-it-suite and core-it-support, looks nice IMHO
and is still reasonably short (which is all I am interested in). So
unless somebody objects, let's go for that ;-)
I additionally think the src/main/resources/* paths could be
reduced to just the issue number (mng-1234), without the
description of the problem (the description can be retained in Java
test class).
+1 from me. However, since this changes a naming scheme that was
previously established by some reasoning I assume, I would like to
get some more feedback on this particular change before I take
actions in this direction.
I think much of the naming was haphazard in that a bunch of people
start adding/changing things without talking to other people. So while
you're taking a full pass through the system, you're doing the work
and you have a flare for consistency (a complement) so if no one
responds to your queries then do as you see fit.
Benjamin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
Jason
----------------------------------------------------------
Jason van Zyl
Founder, Apache Maven
jason at sonatype dot com
----------------------------------------------------------
Three people can keep a secret provided two of them are dead.
-- Unknown
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
