Agreed. I would like that we simplify our notifications
I we could remove them from hud...@apache and continuum if we don't use them
anymore.

Arnaud

On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 9:40 PM, Brett Porter <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 16/12/2008, at 1:42 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
>  I think before the alpha-1 I don't think everyone is interested in getting
>> spammed, but once the release is cut the goal is to keep the build on the
>> grid machines in a perpetual working state so standard notification at that
>> point should be fine.
>>
>
> With them up and running now I'd expect that the objective is already to
> keep them in a perpetual working state, so changing the notifications over
> would be helpful. There are some people changing the ITs even if they aren't
> changing trunk (for 2.0.10, f.e.) and it'd be good to know the effect that
> has.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Brett
>
> --
> Brett Porter
> [email protected]
> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>


-- 
..........................................................
Arnaud HERITIER
12 guidelines to boost your productivity with a Java software factory -
http://tinyurl.com/56s9tw
..........................................................
OCTO Technology - aheritier AT octo DOT com
www.octo.com | blog.octo.com
..........................................................
ASF - aheritier AT apache DOT org
www.apache.org | maven.apache.org
...........................................................

Reply via email to