Ralph Goers wrote:
I understand what you are suggesting, although the example above
doesn't seem to match since the asm and platform tags are used outside
the scope.
Maybe because we understand the scope a little differently? For me scope
is just a name - it does not have any attributes. So the example simply
states that in the qa scope I need the binaries, identified by the
specified query, nothing else. So when the client asks to resolve
conflicts for qa - this what Mercury is going to do.
In any case, what you are discussing here is right on the money with
what I am looking for.
As far as I understand - what I described is exactly what Jason is
talking about, maybe in different terms.
I guess - this is not the last time we talk about it :)
Thanks,
Oleg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
