My only comment is this:

I don't want to have to remember how you guys have uniquely
abbreviated password. "Enc" is fine, "passwd" is a guessing game, and
I believe should be spelled out.

Paul

On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 5:27 AM, Brett Porter <[email protected]> wrote:
> With 2.1.0 imminent, we'll need to finalise on this soon - are the current
> options satisfactory?
>
> Cheers,
> Brett
>
> On 24/02/2009, at 1:41 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
>
>>
>> On 23/02/2009, at 4:45 PM, Oleg Gusakov wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Brett Porter wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I don't view this as a temporary measure - as my second comment said,
>>>> you may need a password to get the plugin in the first place. How would you
>>>> address this case?
>>>>
>>> I have never seen an environment where read-only access to central or
>>> central replica is authenticated. Short of that it's just another plugin to
>>> be downloaded and used. Or I completely missed the question?
>>
>> That's right, it's the situation I was thinking of. I was thinking along
>> the lines of a vetted repository where direct use of central is not used.
>> It's maybe still unlikely that would be authenticated, but I wouldn't rule
>> it out.
>>
>> Thinking it through, to me this actually feels a more natural fit in the
>> CLI now, along with the other settings-based operations, pretty much
>> symmetrical with the location of the operation to decode the passwords in
>> the settings file. For a user, manipulation of the settings file is
>> generally a set-up task, before you do anything else. This location also
>> makes it very snappy, not going through the whole plugin cycle, and had very
>> little impact on the code since it was already mostly achieved through the
>> sec-dispatcher and cipher. A plugin for this would see infrequent releases -
>> perhaps none - which seems an odd evolutionary cycle for an independent
>> piece of code.
>>
>> Not that tied to it being in the CLI if a suitable replacement is already
>> in place, but I hope this is somewhat convincing :)
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Brett
>>
>> --
>> Brett Porter
>> [email protected]
>> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>>
>
> --
> Brett Porter
> [email protected]
> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to