It's now --encrypt-passwd (and --encrypt-master-passwd) based on
Oleg's suggestion. passwd is pretty common, and you can see it from
mvn -h.
Cheers,
Brett
On 27/02/2009, at 12:30 AM, Paul Benedict wrote:
My only comment is this:
I don't want to have to remember how you guys have uniquely
abbreviated password. "Enc" is fine, "passwd" is a guessing game, and
I believe should be spelled out.
Paul
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 5:27 AM, Brett Porter <[email protected]>
wrote:
With 2.1.0 imminent, we'll need to finalise on this soon - are the
current
options satisfactory?
Cheers,
Brett
On 24/02/2009, at 1:41 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
On 23/02/2009, at 4:45 PM, Oleg Gusakov wrote:
Brett Porter wrote:
I don't view this as a temporary measure - as my second comment
said,
you may need a password to get the plugin in the first place.
How would you
address this case?
I have never seen an environment where read-only access to
central or
central replica is authenticated. Short of that it's just another
plugin to
be downloaded and used. Or I completely missed the question?
That's right, it's the situation I was thinking of. I was thinking
along
the lines of a vetted repository where direct use of central is
not used.
It's maybe still unlikely that would be authenticated, but I
wouldn't rule
it out.
Thinking it through, to me this actually feels a more natural fit
in the
CLI now, along with the other settings-based operations, pretty much
symmetrical with the location of the operation to decode the
passwords in
the settings file. For a user, manipulation of the settings file is
generally a set-up task, before you do anything else. This
location also
makes it very snappy, not going through the whole plugin cycle,
and had very
little impact on the code since it was already mostly achieved
through the
sec-dispatcher and cipher. A plugin for this would see infrequent
releases -
perhaps none - which seems an odd evolutionary cycle for an
independent
piece of code.
Not that tied to it being in the CLI if a suitable replacement is
already
in place, but I hope this is somewhat convincing :)
Cheers,
Brett
--
Brett Porter
[email protected]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
--
Brett Porter
[email protected]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
--
Brett Porter
[email protected]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]