So the Brett proposal looks fine too.
I can mark the svnjava provider as optionnal and explain why on the
scm site and explain how to use it.
--
Olivier

2009/3/19 Jason van Zyl <[email protected]>:
> From my experience asking anyone about anything legal has never been
> resolved in any timely manner.
>
> Whether grand fathered or anything else. Discussions have gone on for a very
> long time.
>
> Olivier if you want to release it then I would just taking it to mojo and
> then there are no issues.
>
> On 19-Mar-09, at 5:12 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
>
>>
>> On 19/03/2009, at 7:29 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>>
>>> On 19-Mar-09, at 1:25 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>> Ok. It's was not really clear for me.
>>>>
>>
>> There is precedent - we grandfathered in Checkstyle which is LGPL as it is
>> just a dependency of a plugin, which we don't actually distribute.
>>
>> The general talk - though not confirmed - is that optional dependencies
>> that the user must obtain themselves could be ok. There isn't a legal
>> problem with the combination, but rather a policy one that you don't
>> distribute something that is essentially useless without a dependency of a
>> stronger license.
>>
>> We should ask, but I personally think this is ok, as long as:
>> - it is not made the default provider
>> - instructions on the site about how to use it spell out that it requires
>> the dependency and that it is not under the AL
>> - we don't bundle and distribute
>>
>>>
>>> Technically we are not redistributing anything and we can ask the board
>>> for clarification because in the strictest sense we do not redistribute. But
>>> I think folks here would interpret a dependency in your POM as being
>>> equivalent.
>>
>> No need to ask the board, you can file a request here:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Brett
>>
>> --
>> Brett Porter
>> [email protected]
>> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jason
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Jason van Zyl
> Founder,  Apache Maven
> http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>

Reply via email to