Hi, Not in mojo but here : http://xircles.codehaus.org/projects/svn4j ?
a new path : https://svn.codehaus.org/svn4j/maven-scm-provider-svnjava/ -- Olivier 2009/3/20 Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>: > > On 20/03/2009, at 2:17 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > >> So the Brett proposal looks fine too. >> I can mark the svnjava provider as optionnal and explain why on the >> scm site and explain how to use it. > > That was all my opinion, so we should get it confirmed before release. Note > that under the current FAQ the Sleepycat license (which this is equivalent > to), is not allowed for inclusion. > > I filed: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-45, and added a couple > more points on the list about how we can avoid it getting used without being > aware of the license - putting it in a separate build profile and making > sure it is not in the aggregating POM. > > It can always go to mojo, but I think it'd be a shame to have to separate > it, so it's worth asking. > > - Brett > > -- > Brett Porter > br...@apache.org > http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/ > >
