Brett Porter wrote:
On 16/05/2009, at 6:44 AM, Paul Gier wrote:
Ok, it's fixed. Thanks for the suggestions! Brian are the
requirements for the source distribution defined somewhere? So I can
make sure I'm not missing anything?
What you have now looks right to me.
I would personally not bother with the tar.bz2 (something I'd now say
even for binaries) - the time it takes to build and extra upload doesn't
seem to provide enough value.
Ok, I agree, I'll remove the tar.bz2. I can't imagine there are too many people
that need that format. I just didn't know if there is some apache requirement
to provide it.
Cheers,
Brett
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
