I'm not sure I agree with this change. Why should it just be the present year? If the jar contains schemas or other works that are copyright over the entire range, why would it NOT be the full range?
Dan On Tue July 7 2009 11:15:23 am Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Jukka Zitting<[email protected]> wrote: > > BTW, the copyright year in the NOTICE file should (AFAIK) be the year > > of publication of the compilation (e.g. the jar artifact) instead of > > the range of years of during which the contents of the compilation > > have been authored. Where should I file an issue for this? > > I couldn't find an appropriate issue tracker, so see below for the > proposed patch (against apache-jar-resource-bundle). > > BR, > > Jukka Zitting > > > Index: src/main/resources/META-INF/NOTICE.vm > =================================================================== > --- src/main/resources/META-INF/NOTICE.vm (Revision 790822) > +++ src/main/resources/META-INF/NOTICE.vm (Arbeitskopie) > @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ > > #if ($projectName)$projectName#else${project.name}#end > > -Copyright ${projectTimespan}#if($project.organization.name) > $project.organization.name#else The Apache Software Foundation#end > +Copyright ${presentYear}#if($project.organization.name) > $project.organization.name#else The Apache Software Foundation#end > > > This product includes software developed at > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] -- Daniel Kulp [email protected] http://www.dankulp.com/blog --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
