On 10/11/2009, at 2:05 PM, Dan Fabulich wrote:
I just posted a proposal that the code I checked in before this
announcement should make it in to alpha-3.
I think if I vote -1 that will veto the release. I don't think
that's professional (I did just break the build three days before
the release vote, and I'm still quite ashamed by it), so I'll just
say -0.9.
There's no vetoes on releases.
I think we should land the MNG-3004 branch to trunk and cut a new RC
for alpha-3.
Otherwise, I guess I'll try to kick off an alpha-4 vote shortly
after alpha-3, which seems wasteful.
Versions are cheap :)
I haven't tested alpha-3 yet, but I don't want to see anything derail
that, since it's been a long time coming. I think it would be better
for issues found after the last 11 months of changes to be separate
from anything introduced by a multi-threaded build.
- Brett
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
