... "Renaming" (changing GAVs of modules, maybe a LOT of them) is PITA in this case, IMHO. ... mvn versions:set -DnewVersion=A.B.C-optim-SNAPSHOT
And it's done ? Arnaud Héritier Software Factory Manager eXo platform - http://www.exoplatform.com --- http://www.aheritier.net 2009/12/7 Tamás Cservenák <[email protected]> > Well, how about a "feature branch" (short lived branches)? Or you modify > all > the modules to have different GAV upon branch? This is kinda nonsense to > me, > since I branch it to do some feature that I know will get back into trunk. > "Renaming" (changing GAVs of modules, maybe a LOT of them) is PITA in this > case, IMHO. > > But even then, I dislike very much the idea that Maven "optimizes" this, > and > does less then I tell it to do ;) > > ~t~ > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Arnaud HERITIER <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > You have the same version in 2 branches in a project ? > > For me it is a bad practice > > Each branch has it own version to avoid those sort of conflict. > > > > > > Arnaud Héritier > > Software Factory Manager > > eXo platform - http://www.exoplatform.com > > --- > > http://www.aheritier.net > > > > > > 2009/12/7 Tamás Cservenák <[email protected]> > > > > > Hi there, > > > > > > this is mainly about this issue: > > > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4368 > > > > > > It caused a lot of grief (and lost hours) to me, until I figured what > > > happens on me. > > > > > > IMHO, no "optimization" like this should be done against local > > repository. > > > > > > Please undo it. > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > ~t~ > > > > > >
