Okay, let's put it this way:

are you saying that all the different GIT reposes out there containing
"project A" mirrors should have different versions? Who will coordinate
those?

It's somehow incompatible with Git (and probably any other distributed SCM)
in very fundamental way....

~t~

On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Arnaud HERITIER <[email protected]> wrote:

> ...
> "Renaming" (changing GAVs of modules, maybe a LOT of them) is PITA in this
> case, IMHO.
> ...
> mvn versions:set -DnewVersion=A.B.C-optim-SNAPSHOT
>
> And it's done ?
>
>
> Arnaud Héritier
> Software Factory Manager
> eXo platform - http://www.exoplatform.com
> ---
> http://www.aheritier.net
>
>
> 2009/12/7 Tamás Cservenák <[email protected]>
>
> > Well, how about a "feature branch" (short lived branches)? Or you modify
> > all
> > the modules to have different GAV upon branch? This is kinda nonsense to
> > me,
> > since I branch it to do some feature that I know will get back into
> trunk.
> > "Renaming" (changing GAVs of modules, maybe a LOT of them) is PITA in
> this
> > case, IMHO.
> >
> > But even then, I dislike very much the idea that Maven "optimizes" this,
> > and
> > does less then I tell it to do ;)
> >
> > ~t~
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Arnaud HERITIER <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > You have the same version in 2 branches in a project ?
> > > For me it is a bad practice
> > > Each branch has it own version to avoid those sort of conflict.
> > >
> > >
> > > Arnaud Héritier
> > > Software Factory Manager
> > > eXo platform - http://www.exoplatform.com
> > > ---
> > > http://www.aheritier.net
> > >
> > >
> > > 2009/12/7 Tamás Cservenák <[email protected]>
> > >
> > > > Hi there,
> > > >
> > > > this is mainly about this issue:
> > > > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4368
> > > >
> > > > It caused a lot of grief (and lost hours) to me, until I figured what
> > > > happens on me.
> > > >
> > > > IMHO, no "optimization" like this should be done against local
> > > repository.
> > > >
> > > > Please undo it.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > ~t~
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to