On 2009-12-29, at 10:33 AM, Brett Porter wrote:

> 
> On 29/12/2009, at 4:49 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> 
>> There are 511 issues left if you exclude the documentation fix version. Call 
>> it 30 minutes an issue on average and that's ~250 man hours. If we could get 
>> 10 people in January to do 25 hours (which is a lot for most people) and try 
>> and make it easier for users to validate fixes we might be able to pull it 
>> off in January.
>> 
>> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?fixfor=13143&fixfor=14504&fixfor=16088&fixfor=16089&fixfor=14118&fixfor=16090&fixfor=16087&fixfor=15103&fixfor=16094&fixfor=16093&fixfor=15565&fixfor=15472&fixfor=15554&fixfor=13145&fixfor=13142&fixfor=13141&fixfor=15996&fixfor=14593&pid=10500&status=1&status=3&status=4&reset=true&show=View+%26gt%3B%26gt%3B
>> 
> 
> I tend to work through the "unscheduled" issues every now and then, since it 
> makes it easier to find the new stuff that comes in. I can focus on starting 
> there.
> 
> I've liked having a "Backlog" version for things that are reviewed and may be 
> fixed in the future, without committing to a version/series. Could we create 
> that to start pushing valid issues into so they don't get reviewed twice? The 
> goal is then to get rid of the *.x versions. Alternatively we could just 
> unschedule them all and push them to the 3.x bucket.
> 
> The criteria being:
> - regressions in 2.1.x/2.2.x -> 2.2.2
> - regressions in 3.0-alpha-X -> 3.0-alpha-7
> - very select number new features and improvements -> 3.1
> - everything else that is still valid -> Backlog
> 
> Right?
> 

Whatever you guys are going to fix in 2.x.x keep it in those versions. If 
you're not then flush them forward into 3.x so that we can start validating 
them against 3.0 to see if they are fixed or truly need to be addressed.

Anything requiring POM changes that look reasonably interesting I've been 
putting in 3.0.alpha1.

But in all honesty we should get down to less then 50 issues or we're never 
going to be able to manage them.

I think just trying to validate what's there against the 3.0 alphas will get 
rid of a lot of cruft. I think if we start there we'll be in good shape.

> Cheers,
> Brett
> 
> --
> Brett Porter
> [email protected]
> http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> 

Thanks,

Jason

----------------------------------------------------------
Jason van Zyl
Founder,  Apache Maven
http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
----------------------------------------------------------


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to