On 08/01/2010, at 1:55 AM, Brian Fox wrote: >> >> What is your proposal here - did you want to vote those 3 people in as >> committers on the basis of the contribution, or will the existing committers >> apply patches until the rest of us get to know them? (I don't know who they >> are, so we may already). Funnily enough these alternatives have been a >> current topic on gene...@incubator for other projects :) > > I was intentionally vague because I didn't want to imply any type of > contingency on the committers coming with the code. The committers are > Tamas Cservanak, Damian Bradicich and Brian Demers. They've all been > around the periphery of Maven for a while now, on the lists and irc > etc. It would certainly make maintenance easier if they had commit > access, but we can judge that on merits separate from the code.
Makes sense. > > I did review the incubator threads and it seemed to be the consensus > that the incubator has it's hands full and that projects should > incubate subproject code where applicable. I see no value in trying to > bring this code in through the full incubator since any new committers > are already familiar with the process and we have proper mentors > available. Absolutely. I think there are times when incubating a subproject makes sense, but not necessary in this case. -- Brett Porter br...@apache.org http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
