On 30 January 2010 02:38, Jason van Zyl <ja...@sonatype.com> wrote: > > On 2010-01-29, at 4:09 PM, nicolas de loof wrote: > > > could we use "milestone" as names in replacement for "alpha", so that we > get > > more early-adopter to test the (pre)release and detected regressions ? > > > > I can understand the difficulty to suggest a build tool with "alpha" in > > version name. Would you install Windows 8 alpha on your @work computer ? > ;) > > > > I'm not really into playing the name game to please managers. I think what > we're doing is the right way to go. It's going to take a bit longer, but > we're absorbing the change requests as fast as we can now. The error reports > are of good quality and helpful. When those dry up then it will be time to > move on. > > +1, we have a small pile of issues to verify and perhaps fix for 3.0-alpha-7, and a couple of large piles still to sort through, plus whatever reports are coming in - but we know what constitutes the release now and those wanting to see it get to final need only help reduce the number of issues through patches and/or test cases :)
Cheers, Brett
