I agree with Baptiste that the explanation is ambiguous. I understand the
same thing.

Regards
Jeff MAURY

On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Benjamin Bentmann <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Baptiste MATHUS wrote:
>
>  Does it mean that<relativePath>  must now be put *even if* the parent pom
>> is
>> in the default path?
>>
>
> No, it means the effective value for <relativePath> should be correct,
> whether that value is given by the user or using the implicit default.
>
>
> Benjamin
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>


-- 
"Legacy code" often differs from its suggested alternative by actually
working and scaling.
 - Bjarne Stroustrup

http://www.jeffmaury.com
http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com
http://www.twitter.com/jeffmaury

Reply via email to