I agree with Baptiste that the explanation is ambiguous. I understand the same thing.
Regards Jeff MAURY On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Benjamin Bentmann < [email protected]> wrote: > Baptiste MATHUS wrote: > > Does it mean that<relativePath> must now be put *even if* the parent pom >> is >> in the default path? >> > > No, it means the effective value for <relativePath> should be correct, > whether that value is given by the user or using the implicit default. > > > Benjamin > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- "Legacy code" often differs from its suggested alternative by actually working and scaling. - Bjarne Stroustrup http://www.jeffmaury.com http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com http://www.twitter.com/jeffmaury
