Thanks for the small rewrite done, Benjamin. Cheers
2010/9/16 Jeff MAURY <jeffma...@jeffmaury.com> > I agree with Baptiste that the explanation is ambiguous. I understand the > same thing. > > Regards > Jeff MAURY > > On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Benjamin Bentmann < > benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu> wrote: > > > Baptiste MATHUS wrote: > > > > Does it mean that<relativePath> must now be put *even if* the parent > pom > >> is > >> in the default path? > >> > > > > No, it means the effective value for <relativePath> should be correct, > > whether that value is given by the user or using the implicit default. > > > > > > Benjamin > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > > > > > > -- > "Legacy code" often differs from its suggested alternative by actually > working and scaling. > - Bjarne Stroustrup > > http://www.jeffmaury.com > http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com > http://www.twitter.com/jeffmaury > -- Baptiste <Batmat> MATHUS - http://batmat.net Sauvez un arbre, Mangez un castor !
