On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Paul Benedict <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 on keeping the eclipse plugin. I like m2Eclipse but at times is > buggy so I fall back to using this often.
As someone who irregularly maintains m-e-p I have the same issues as above. I've got m2eclipse working at home but I've never been able to get it to work in my corporate environment yet. (I've never looked at Eclipse/STS) m-e-p mostly works. A lot of the problems are around the edge cases. And there are a lot of missing integration tests for the IBM specific tools. Maybe giving it a new home would help, I haven't thought about it enough. I've not looked at git usage at all, and from the little I understand someone still needs to maintain it so that it can be released and synced (via forge to central, or however). I dont think a move will help the maintenance question, but it may remove the (mis)percpetion that it is more actively maintained. I'd be interested to see other peoples opinions --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
