On 2010-12-15 23:03, Jesse Farinacci wrote:
> Greetings,
> 
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Dennis Lundberg <denn...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Proposal+--+A+creation+and+retirement+plan+for+plugins
> 
>>From the proposal:
> 
> 2. Make one final release of the plugin before it is retired. This
> allows us to make a clean break. The final release must change the POM
> so that SCM URLs are removed or changed to reflect the decision made
> in the vote. If the plugin is moved elsewhere a prominent notice must
> be placed on the front page of the plugin's site. The person who wants
> to retire a plugin is the one who does the final release.
> 
> This seems wrong to me. Why would we make a final release from the
> official Maven forge and yet have an SCM which points somewhere else?
> This seems really misleading; certainly more-so than a future user
> going to the (now defunct) SCM and not finding the plugin and having
> to do some enlightenment work about where the release is now.

Right, removing the Source Repository *report* is probably the best way
to go.

> I'm not even sure the m-release-p could technically handle such a thing.
> 
> -Jesse
> 


-- 
Dennis Lundberg

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Reply via email to