On 2010-12-15 23:03, Jesse Farinacci wrote: > Greetings, > > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Dennis Lundberg <denn...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Proposal+--+A+creation+and+retirement+plan+for+plugins > >>From the proposal: > > 2. Make one final release of the plugin before it is retired. This > allows us to make a clean break. The final release must change the POM > so that SCM URLs are removed or changed to reflect the decision made > in the vote. If the plugin is moved elsewhere a prominent notice must > be placed on the front page of the plugin's site. The person who wants > to retire a plugin is the one who does the final release. > > This seems wrong to me. Why would we make a final release from the > official Maven forge and yet have an SCM which points somewhere else? > This seems really misleading; certainly more-so than a future user > going to the (now defunct) SCM and not finding the plugin and having > to do some enlightenment work about where the release is now.
Right, removing the Source Repository *report* is probably the best way to go. > I'm not even sure the m-release-p could technically handle such a thing. > > -Jesse > -- Dennis Lundberg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org