So, the lesson I take from this is that the appassembler would never have been releasable at Apache, and that releasing it at codehaus without getting the author (who happens to be in Japan) to provide an unambiguous license was perhaps ill-advised.
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote: >> just an idea: what about extending the maven-release-plugin to ask for a >> license if the pom doesn't contain a <license> section? > > In principle, this would be a good feature to add to a verification > tool like Rat. > > In this case, JSW has a <license> section but that license contains > meta-licensing information (a way for a user to obtain a license, > rather than a direct license) > > Robert > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
