So I reformulate my question : 'how to be in the initial set of committers ?" too late ?
2011/8/18 Jason van Zyl <[email protected]>: > > On Aug 18, 2011, at 9:51 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > >> Hello, >> Perso the license question doesn't matter a lot as long we have a >> compatible one with ASF. >> Have a look at tomcat 7 or the cxf distribs which contains ecj and/or >> jetty so the Eclipse license is not a trouble for ASF products (sure >> at least for me). >> My main point is more regarding the governance model and the devs/pmcs >> involved for those projects @eclipse. >> If I look at the various proposals for aether [1] and sisu [2], the >> initial set of committers doesn't show a diversity or a huge >> community. >> >> So even if probably I won't be a huge committer, how will it be >> possible to participate in the projects ? > > The process is more or less identical to Apache. The voting starts by a > committer nominating someone and the process is tracked in the portal where > votes are registered and tracked. Election of committers is the domain of > committers and the PMC has to approve the final vote. PMC members are usually > committers. As committers vote, they are posted to the mailing list in > question so people can see the progress. > >> And probably some others Maven folks have the same question. >> >> Thanks, >> -- >> Olivier Lamy >> Talend : http://talend.com >> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy >> >> [1] http://www.eclipse.org/proposals/technology.aether/ >> [2] http://www.eclipse.org/proposals/technology.sisu/ >> >> >> 2011/8/18 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>: >>> Jason, Brian, Benjamin or any other person involved, >>> >>> Before voting on this issue, I'd like to get an idea what it means for us. >>> So please allow me a few questions: >>> >>> a.) how can appache maven committers anticipate on aether over at Eclipse? >>> What if someone (like me) likes to contribute, but wants to make sure that >>> his contributions are also possible to release separately under ALv2? >>> >>> b.) is it possible to operate aether without sisu? Pure JSR-330 and/or >>> plexus DI stuff is fine. Is there any direct guice depending code in aether? >>> >>> c.) will the package names remain com.sonatype or will they get changed to >>> org.eclipse.*? This is important for us to know. If so, we can just cancel >>> the vote and wait for this stuff to be released at Eclipse. >>> >>> d.) How long will it take to get the first aether release done at Eclipse? >>> >>> If there is a chilly way for maven committers to get involved with that >>> stuff over at Eclipse, then this would be a big pro. >>> >>> txs and LieGrue, >>> strub >>> >>> >>> --- On Thu, 8/18/11, Anders Hammar <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> From: Anders Hammar <[email protected]> >>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Usage of Aether and Sisu as dependencies of maven core >>>> with EPL licenses - take 2 >>>> To: "Maven Developers List" <[email protected]> >>>> Date: Thursday, August 18, 2011, 10:56 AM >>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>> >>>> /Anders >>>> >>>> 2011/8/18 Arnaud Héritier <[email protected]>: >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> Thus as decided with Mark and Kristian I relaunch a >>>> new vote with a better >>>>> scope about what we are voting for. >>>>> >>>>> Next releases of SISU and Aether will be released at >>>> Eclipse.org under EPL >>>>> 1.0 license. >>>>> Before they were published under ASL or dual ASL/EPL >>>> licenses thus as >>>>> defined in our policy [1] this change put them in >>>> Category B [2] and we need >>>>> to validate this change by a vote with a majority of >>>> the PMC in favor (but >>>>> the vote is open to everybody). >>>>> I push only one vote for both dependencies as for >>>> now I see no reason to >>>>> accept one and not the other. >>>>> This vote will be open for 6 days as we are in >>>> august (If we have not >>>>> enough votes at the end of next wednesday will see if >>>> we really need to >>>>> extend it). >>>>> >>>>> The vote : >>>>> >>>>> [+1] I'm in favor to use as Maven core dependencies >>>> SISU and AETHER libraries >>>>> published under EPL 1.0 License and released under >>>> eclipse.org governance >>>>> [+0] No opinion, do what you want. >>>>> [-1] I'm against because .... (please elaborate) >>>>> >>>>> Arnaud >>>>> >>>>> [1] http://maven.apache.org/developers/dependency-policies.html >>>>> [2] http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b >>>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> >>>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > Thanks, > > Jason > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Jason van Zyl > Founder, Apache Maven > http://twitter.com/jvanzyl > --------------------------------------------------------- > > A party which is not afraid of letting culture, > business, and welfare go to ruin completely can > be omnipotent for a while. > > -- Jakob Burckhardt > > > > -- Olivier Lamy Talend : http://talend.com http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
