Thus with Olivier and Stéphane votes we have the majority (12/22) of PMCs voting in favor to use as Maven core dependencies SISU and AETHER libraries published under EPL 1.0 License and released under eclipse.org governance.
Voters were : Arnaud,Kristian,Ralph,Hervé,Dennis,Wayne,John,Stephen,Barrie,Mark S,Olivier, Stéphane We can now go forward and prepare a new release as soon as these libraries will be published from eclipse under these terms. Cheers, Arnaud On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 for the vote and for the mark proposal (not have anymore external > stuff part of our public api). > > 2011/8/19 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>: > > +1 for the upgrade in principal. It's not the best solution, but the best > solution quickly available. > > > > Maven should nontheless introduce an own simplified SPI for that stuff > and use it in maven-core. All aether stuff should really only be handled in > the maven-aether-provider and we should change this part to be pluggable. > > > > LieGrue, > > strub > > > > > > --- On Thu, 8/18/11, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> wrote: > > > >> From: Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Usage of Aether and Sisu as dependencies of maven > core with EPL licenses - take 2 > >> To: "Maven Developers List" <dev@maven.apache.org> > >> Date: Thursday, August 18, 2011, 12:59 PM > >> Jason, Brian, Benjamin or any other > >> person involved, > >> > >> Before voting on this issue, I'd like to get an idea what > >> it means for us. So please allow me a few questions: > >> > >> a.) how can appache maven committers anticipate on aether > >> over at Eclipse? What if someone (like me) likes to > >> contribute, but wants to make sure that his contributions > >> are also possible to release separately under ALv2? > >> > >> b.) is it possible to operate aether without sisu? Pure > >> JSR-330 and/or plexus DI stuff is fine. Is there any direct > >> guice depending code in aether? > >> > >> c.) will the package names remain com.sonatype or will they > >> get changed to org.eclipse.*? This is important for us to > >> know. If so, we can just cancel the vote and wait for this > >> stuff to be released at Eclipse. > >> > >> d.) How long will it take to get the first aether release > >> done at Eclipse? > >> > >> If there is a chilly way for maven committers to get > >> involved with that stuff over at Eclipse, then this would be > >> a big pro. > >> > >> txs and LieGrue, > >> strub > >> > >> > >> --- On Thu, 8/18/11, Anders Hammar <and...@hammar.net> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > From: Anders Hammar <and...@hammar.net> > >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Usage of Aether and Sisu as > >> dependencies of maven core with EPL licenses - take 2 > >> > To: "Maven Developers List" <dev@maven.apache.org> > >> > Date: Thursday, August 18, 2011, 10:56 AM > >> > +1 (non-binding) > >> > > >> > /Anders > >> > > >> > 2011/8/18 Arnaud Héritier <aherit...@gmail.com>: > >> > > Hi all, > >> > > > >> > > Thus as decided with Mark and Kristian I > >> relaunch a > >> > new vote with a better > >> > > scope about what we are voting for. > >> > > > >> > > Next releases of SISU and Aether will be > >> released at > >> > Eclipse.org under EPL > >> > > 1.0 license. > >> > > Before they were published under ASL or dual > >> ASL/EPL > >> > licenses thus as > >> > > defined in our policy [1] this change put them > >> in > >> > Category B [2] and we need > >> > > to validate this change by a vote with a majority > >> of > >> > the PMC in favor (but > >> > > the vote is open to everybody). > >> > > I push only one vote for both dependencies as > >> for > >> > now I see no reason to > >> > > accept one and not the other. > >> > > This vote will be open for 6 days as we are in > >> > august (If we have not > >> > > enough votes at the end of next wednesday will > >> see if > >> > we really need to > >> > > extend it). > >> > > > >> > > The vote : > >> > > > >> > > [+1] I'm in favor to use as Maven core > >> dependencies > >> > SISU and AETHER libraries > >> > > published under EPL 1.0 License and released > >> under > >> > eclipse.org governance > >> > > [+0] No opinion, do what you want. > >> > > [-1] I'm against because .... (please > >> elaborate) > >> > > > >> > > Arnaud > >> > > > >> > > [1] http://maven.apache.org/developers/dependency-policies.html > >> > > [2] http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > >> > > >> > > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > >> > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > > > > > > > -- > Olivier Lamy > Talend : http://talend.com > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > >
