On 4 November 2011 11:04, Mark Derricutt <m...@talios.com> wrote:
> If its stuck at the bottom of the pile for an unknown amount of time - I'd
> REALLY love to see 3.0.4. ship out with the current non-eclipse Aether.
>
> Leaving a broken Maven out in the wild for what appears to be politics more
> than anything just continues to hurt the Maven name.
>
> I was under the impression that the "move to Eclipse" was only going to
> take 2-3 weeks, whats it been now - 2-3 months almost?
>

This is what we were lead to believe, i.e. that it would be released @
eclipse within a couple of weeks....

If it really is going to take much longer then all somebody needs to
do is propose a vote to release with the new one, and then the PMC can
decide on that vote... at the time of the last vote we were told it
would be at eclipse soon... not that a first release from eclipse
would be a long time away...

So if there is a committer willing to step up and ask to use the newer
dependency... please do

-Stephen

> Mark
>
> --
> "Great artists are extremely selfish and arrogant things" — Steven Wilson,
> Porcupine Tree
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 11:55 PM, Benjamin Bentmann <
> benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu> wrote:
>
>> Looking at Eclipse' IPZilla, which btw is accessible to any Eclipse
>> committer, I see currently around 180 open CQs that the IP team needs to
>> deal with, Aether just being one among many projects.
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Reply via email to