could be better maybe. But means 1.6 required. Do you want to work on a branch with this change ?
2012/6/28 Milos Kleint <mkle...@gmail.com>: > why not use jdk's own annotation processors (which get compiled by > javac are we save ourselves an extra mojo execution)? > > Milos > > On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote: >> Hi, >> We use asm to collect annotations from compiled classes (so scope compile ) >> Makes sense ? >> >> 2012/6/28 Milos Kleint <mkle...@gmail.com>: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I'm in the process of rewriting the nbm-maven-plugin at mojo to use >>> the new annotations instead of javadoc tags. It appears to be working >>> fine, but I'm wondering why the retention policy is CLASS. Since it's >>> only used to generate the xml file, it could be turned into SOURCE and >>> the annotation dependency could be made "provided". Am I missing >>> something? >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Milos Kleint >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Olivier Lamy >> Talend: http://coders.talend.com >> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > -- Olivier Lamy Talend: http://coders.talend.com http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
