This would be an incompatible change, would it?
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Benson Margulies <[email protected]>wrote: > I want to take up a suggestion of Stephen Connolly and fix the > interactions between shade and jar by changing the default file name > of 'replacing' shaded jars. I'd like incremental jar-ing to work by > default, so I want to change the default behavior. 2.1 or 3.0? > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- The best argument for celibacy is that the clergy will sooner or later become extinct.
