On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Stephen Connolly
<[email protected]> wrote:
> And you'll recall my vote is for 3.0 (assuming the idea works and you
> decide to go ahead with it, that is)

I have no objection to 3. I sent this message because (1) the recent
release of 2.0 made me feel some risk of silliness, and (b) I
preferred to flush out any strong feelings well in advance.


>
> [Briefly, for anyone who is interested, the idea is to replace the artifact
> attached to the reactor, rather than replace the file... Thus jar:jar's
> output will be the responsibility of jar:jar and shade:shade can just
> compare timestamps against its peevious output and be happy if it has a
> no-op. people relying on the actual files in target having specific names
> will have issues until they adapt (or switch the flag back to the pre-3.0
> behaviour). People interacting with the repo will be unaffected.]
>
> - Stephen
>
> On Friday, 23 November 2012, Benson Margulies wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Jochen Wiedmann
>> <[email protected] <javascript:;>> wrote:
>> > This would be an incompatible change, would it?
>>
>> Yes, indeed, insofar as anyone who scripted to expect the shaded
>> version to be sitting in target under finalName would be broken
>>
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Benson Margulies <
>> [email protected] <javascript:;>>wrote:
>> >
>> >> I want to take up a suggestion of Stephen Connolly and fix the
>> >> interactions between shade and jar by changing the default file name
>> >> of 'replacing' shaded jars. I'd like incremental jar-ing to work by
>> >> default, so I want to change the default behavior. 2.1 or 3.0?
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] <javascript:;>
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]<javascript:;>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > The best argument for celibacy is that the clergy will sooner or later
>> > become extinct.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] <javascript:;>
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] <javascript:;>
>>
>>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to