+1, bump to JDK6 minimum for Maven.
2013/2/6 Stephen Connolly <[email protected]> > I think we should at least have a minor version bump on core to > co-incide... Though I think calling it maven 4.0 might be better (that way > we catch up with the model version ;-) > > On Wednesday, 6 February 2013, Olivier Lamy wrote: > > > Hi, > > As we are now in 2013, it's probably time to think about that (again). > > > > Reading [1], even 1.6 won't be anymore updated after feb 2013. > > > > Can we say we are safe to go to 1.6 as minimum required ? > > > > NOTE: That will probably need a vote. So depending on how the thread > > move, I will start a vote (or not). > > > > Thanks > > -- > > Olivier Lamy > > Talend: http://coders.talend.com > > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy > > > > [1] http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/eol-135779.html > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] <javascript:;> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]<javascript:;> > > > > > > -- > Baptiste <Batmat> MATHUS - http://batmat.net > Sauvez un arbre, > Mangez un castor ! nbsp;!
