What are the big features and possibilities we gain from 1.6? Build systems are pretty late in the chain. We should still be able to build on systems which are 2+ years old.
Is there a technical reason to restrict this or is it just that we don't actively support it anymore (not doing IT, etc)? As comparison: we still supported 1.4 and older until not that far ago ;) LieGrue, strub >________________________________ > From: Baptiste MATHUS <[email protected]> >To: Maven Developers List <[email protected]> >Sent: Wednesday, February 6, 2013 10:31 PM >Subject: Re: EOL of 1.5 as minimum > >+1, bump to JDK6 minimum for Maven. > > >2013/2/6 Stephen Connolly <[email protected]> > >> I think we should at least have a minor version bump on core to >> co-incide... Though I think calling it maven 4.0 might be better (that way >> we catch up with the model version ;-) >> >> On Wednesday, 6 February 2013, Olivier Lamy wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > As we are now in 2013, it's probably time to think about that (again). >> > >> > Reading [1], even 1.6 won't be anymore updated after feb 2013. >> > >> > Can we say we are safe to go to 1.6 as minimum required ? >> > >> > NOTE: That will probably need a vote. So depending on how the thread >> > move, I will start a vote (or not). >> > >> > Thanks >> > -- >> > Olivier Lamy >> > Talend: http://coders.talend.com >> > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy >> > >> > [1] http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/eol-135779.html >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] <javascript:;> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]<javascript:;> >> > >> > >> >> -- >> Baptiste <Batmat> MATHUS - http://batmat.net >> Sauvez un arbre, >> Mangez un castor ! nbsp;! > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
