On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 3:24 AM, Jason van Zyl <ja...@tesla.io> wrote:
> When a release fails like this it is annoying to have to rev back the > version of the POM. I'm not sure who flipped the versions in the POM and > while it's a little more visible to see what you're moving toward I prefer > the pattern of: > > 3.1-SNAPSHOT --> 3.1.1 --> 3.1-SNAPSHOT --> 3.1.2 --> 3.1-SNAPSHOT > > I know this may not be obvious to the casual observer as they may think > 3.1 is next, but I'm personally fine with that. > > So, what you've done is to change the meaning of SNAPSHOT. Why would you not stick with the far more clearly understood: 3.1.1-SNAPSHOT -> 3.1.1 -> 3.1.2-SNAPSHOT -> 3.1.2 etc If the IT's have issues, then there is clearly something wrong with them, and they should be fixed. Did the IT's fail in a similar manner for 3.0.x ? -Chris
