On 16 September 2013 08:20, Jörg Schaible <[email protected]>wrote:
> Hi Jason, > > Jason van Zyl wrote: > > > When a release fails like this it is annoying to have to rev back the > > version of the POM. I'm not sure who flipped the versions in the POM and > > while it's a little more visible to see what you're moving toward I > prefer > > the pattern of: > > > > 3.1-SNAPSHOT --> 3.1.1 --> 3.1-SNAPSHOT --> 3.1.2 --> 3.1-SNAPSHOT > > > > I know this may not be obvious to the casual observer as they may think > > 3.1 is next, but I'm personally fine with that. > > That's quite funny, because we did this years ago when we started using M2 > and then we were told here in the list it is an anti-pattern, because 3.1- > SNAPSHOT is always minor for the dependency resolution than any 3.1.x > release. > > That was before it was decided that version ranges were a bad plan. If we were using version ranges then this would indeed be crapulent > - Jörg > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
