On 2 December 2013 22:34, Stephen Connolly
<[email protected]> wrote:
> -1, for the following reasons
>
> * No checksum of the source bundle in the email, per current vote email
> format: FTR SHA1 of bundle I checked is
> a0fdae255eebc2dfbd0f973073f7c97284b5f9f9.
>
> * The source bundle does not build.
>
> If I look at the difference between the tag and the source bundle I see the
> following:
>
> < DEPENDENCIES
>> < LICENSE
>> >
>> maven-scm-providers/maven-scm-providers-cvs/maven-scm-provider-cvs-commons/src/test/resources/checkoutdir/CVS/Entries
>> >
>> maven-scm-providers/maven-scm-providers-cvs/maven-scm-provider-cvs-commons/src/test/resources/checkoutdir/CVS/Entries.Extra
>> >
>> maven-scm-providers/maven-scm-providers-cvs/maven-scm-provider-cvs-commons/src/test/resources/checkoutdir/CVS/Entries.Extra.Old
>> >
>> maven-scm-providers/maven-scm-providers-cvs/maven-scm-provider-cvs-commons/src/test/resources/checkoutdir/CVS/Entries.Old
>> >
>> maven-scm-providers/maven-scm-providers-cvs/maven-scm-provider-cvs-commons/src/test/resources/checkoutdir/CVS/Repository
>> >
>> maven-scm-providers/maven-scm-providers-cvs/maven-scm-provider-cvs-commons/src/test/resources/checkoutdir/CVS/Root
>> >
>> maven-scm-providers/maven-scm-providers-cvs/maven-scm-provider-cvs-commons/src/test/resources/checkoutdir/CVS/Template
>> >
>> maven-scm-providers/maven-scm-providers-cvs/maven-scm-provider-cvsexe/src/test/repository/CVSROOT/.cvsignore
>> >
>> maven-scm-providers/maven-scm-providers-cvs/maven-scm-provider-cvsexe/src/test/tck-repository/CVSROOT/.cvsignore
>> >
>> maven-scm-providers/maven-scm-providers-cvs/maven-scm-provider-cvsjava/src/test/repository/CVSROOT/.cvsignore
>> >
>> maven-scm-providers/maven-scm-providers-cvs/maven-scm-provider-cvsjava/src/test/tck-repository/CVSROOT/.cvsignore
>> >
>> maven-scm-providers/maven-scm-providers-cvs/maven-scm-provider-cvstest/src/main/resources/repository/CVSROOT/.cvsignore
>> >
>> maven-scm-providers/maven-scm-providers-cvs/maven-scm-provider-cvstest/src/main/resources/tck-repository/CVSROOT/.cvsignore
>> >
>> maven-scm-providers/maven-scm-providers-git/maven-scm-provider-jgit/.gitignore
>> < NOTICE
>
> The DEPENDENCIES, LICENSE & NOTICE files are not in SCM but we have still
> not received a clear response from Legal as to whether this is required,
> only the stated opinions. So these being missing from the tag are not a
> current issue from my perspective.
>
> On the other hand, the default excludes are removing the CVS and SCM test
> data from the bundle. As the bundle is what we are actually voting on I
> think this is a clear -1...
build fine with: mvn install -DskipTests :P
Looks to be a serious problem for all people building from distributed
sources even if no one complain with all scm previous releases....

I will have a look if it's possible to not use default exclude pu. But
if too complicated (maybe need a new assembly release) that will be
definitely out of my motivation.

>
> Of course there are no vetos for releases, so up to the release manager to
> decide what to do if sufficient +1's can be found.
>
>
> On 2 December 2013 08:38, Olivier Lamy <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We fixed 11 issues. The new feature is the jgit provider (based on jgit).
>> Details:
>>
>> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10527&version=18783
>>
>> Staging repository:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-002/
>>
>> Staged site: http://maven.apache.org/scm-archives/scm-LATEST/
>>
>> Sources release:
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-002/org/apache/maven/scm/maven-scm/1.9/maven-scm-1.9-source-release.zip
>>
>> Vote open for 72H
>>
>> [+1]
>> [0]
>> [-1]
>>
>> Thanks
>> --
>> Olivier Lamy
>> Ecetera: http://ecetera.com.au
>> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
>>



-- 
Olivier Lamy
Ecetera: http://ecetera.com.au
http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to