Stephens remarks are valid, let me try to pick this up in the next couple of weeks.

Robert

Op Thu, 19 Dec 2013 18:31:13 +0100 schreef Dominik Bartholdi <[email protected]>:

Thanks Oliver,
its a bit disappointing, as this at the end (at least for me) also means the other scm components are not maintainable anymore… Taking this into account, then its probably a better idea to not have this under the apache umbrella anyway. Where do you think we should release it from? Or should I just make a release with my own gav and publish it via Sonatype?
regards Domi

On 16.12.2013, at 00:15, Olivier Lamy <[email protected]> wrote:

So that's 2 weeks now.
I presume I can say the vote failed.
I will delete the tag and the staging repo.
If someone else want to act RM let's go. perso I'm tired....

@Domi I'm sorry I believed if was a good idea to have the module jgit
here (but cvs looks to me more important :P ).
Anyway we can release that separately somewhere else.

Cheers,

Olivier


On 5 December 2013 04:24, Dominik Bartholdi <[email protected]> wrote:
OK, then you have my +1
/Domi

On 03.12.2013, at 08:20, Olivier Lamy <[email protected]> wrote:

No worries.
IMHO it's not the problem. Issue is cvs-commons module.

--
Olivier
On Dec 3, 2013 3:34 PM, "Dominik Bartholdi" <[email protected]> wrote:

Sorry guys, during the week I’m usually a bit short in time…
But is ist possible, that my commit
d1f102e5223e5fe0f852e1a5becb497f0e860d6a is actually causing this issue? Its an exclude of some CVS stuff I had in my untracked list all the time
when doing a full build...
regards Domi


On 03.12.2013, at 02:57, Olivier Lamy <[email protected]> wrote:

On 3 December 2013 12:52, Bernd Eckenfels <[email protected]>
wrote:
Am 03.12.2013, 02:47 Uhr, schrieb Olivier Lamy <[email protected]>:

For some reasons I don't understand yet why defaultExclude=false
doesn't work for CVS directories.


Uh, isnt that supposed to be "yes" to enable the exclusion of default
patterns?

no because in this case we want some cvs directories included in the
assembly.
That's why we need to use defaultExclude=false to prevent some default
pattern exclusion (or I really understand nothing :-))


Gruss
Bernd


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]




--
Olivier Lamy
Ecetera: http://ecetera.com.au
http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]




--
Olivier Lamy
Ecetera: http://ecetera.com.au
http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to