I usually ignore threads when they degenerate into procedural discussions and I'll guarantee supress any voting thread where the first thing that comes out is a -1; I've got coding to do.
Sorry for being an idiot, I'm usually quite good at keeping my foot out of my mouth. Can't always get it right. Kristian 2013/12/20 Stephen Connolly <stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> > On Thursday, 19 December 2013, Kristian Rosenvold wrote: > > > I think all the crap/trolling in the release threads has gone way too > far, > > it's just not fun any more. > > > > I can only request that PMC members chip in *before* the the vote to > > /improve/ technical problems with a release > > rather than spending a ton of energy documenting their -1 *after* the > > release is staged. > > > I did my testing, I found an issue which, in good conscience I feel means I > cannot vote +1. I stated my vote was not a veto and I would not stand in > the way of a release. This only needed one more +1 from a PMC member... I > don't see that as trolling... Where was your vote? > > > > > > Kristian > > > > > > 2013/12/19 Robert Scholte <rfscho...@apache.org> > > > > > Stephens remarks are valid, let me try to pick this up in the next > couple > > > of weeks. > > > > > > Robert > > > > > > Op Thu, 19 Dec 2013 18:31:13 +0100 schreef Dominik Bartholdi < > > > d...@fortysix.ch>: > > > > > > > > > Thanks Oliver, > > >> its a bit disappointing, as this at the end (at least for me) also > means > > >> the other scm components are not maintainable anymore… > > >> Taking this into account, then its probably a better idea to not have > > >> this under the apache umbrella anyway. > > >> Where do you think we should release it from? Or should I just make a > > >> release with my own gav and publish it via Sonatype? > > >> regards Domi > > >> > > >> On 16.12.2013, at 00:15, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote: > > >> > > >> So that's 2 weeks now. > > >>> I presume I can say the vote failed. > > >>> I will delete the tag and the staging repo. > > >>> If someone else want to act RM let's go. perso I'm tired.... > > >>> > > >>> @Domi I'm sorry I believed if was a good idea to have the module jgit > > >>> here (but cvs looks to me more important :P ). > > >>> Anyway we can release that separately somewhere else. > > >>> > > >>> Cheers, > > >>> > > >>> Olivier > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On 5 December 2013 04:24, Dominik Bartholdi <d...@fortysix.ch> > wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> OK, then you have my +1 > > >>>> /Domi > > >>>> > > >>>> On 03.12.2013, at 08:20, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> No worries. > > >>>>> IMHO it's not the problem. Issue is cvs-commons module. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> -- > > >>>>> Olivier > > >>>>> On Dec 3, 2013 3:34 PM, "Dominik Bartholdi" <d...@fortysix.ch> > > wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Sorry guys, during the week I’m usually a bit short in time… > > >>>>>> But is ist possible, that my commit > > >>>>>> d1f102e5223e5fe0f852e1a5becb497f0e860d6a is actually causing this > > >>>>>> issue? > > >>>>>> Its an exclude of some CVS stuff I had in my untracked list all > the > > >>>>>> time > > >>>>>> when doing a full build... > > >>>>>> regards Domi > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On 03.12.2013, at 02:57, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On 3 December 2013 12:52, Bernd Eckenfels < > e...@zusammenkunft.net> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Am 03.12.2013, 02:47 Uhr, schrieb Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org > >: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> For some reasons I don't understand yet why > defaultExclude=false > > >>>>>>>>> doesn't work for CVS directories. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Uh, isnt that supposed to be "yes" to enable the exclusion of > > >>>>>>>> default > > >>>>>>>> patterns? > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> no because in this case we want some cvs directories included in > > the > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> assembly. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> That's why we need to use defaultExclude=false to prevent some > > >>>>>>> default > > >>>>>>> pattern exclusion (or I really understand nothing :-)) > > >>>> > > > > -- > Sent from my phone >
