> On Oct. 2, 2013, 1:10 a.m., Vinod Kone wrote: > > src/master/master.hpp, line 314 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/14438/diff/1/?file=360292#file360292line314> > > > > what if framework_id itself is not present in the tasks map? Would this > > still work? > > Ben Mahler wrote: > Yep, tasks[task->framework_id()] will insert and return a new empty map > in this case, so the CHECK passes (and we'll always insert the framework id > below). The alternative is a bit more code: > > CHECK(!tasks.contains(task->framework_id()) || > !tasks[task->framework_id()].contains(task->task_id())));
sgtm. - Vinod ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14438/#review26588 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Oct. 2, 2013, 5:46 a.m., Ben Mahler wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/14438/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Oct. 2, 2013, 5:46 a.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman and Vinod Kone. > > > Repository: mesos-git > > > Description > ------- > > Small cleanup, no functional change here. This changes the Slave::tasks: > > hashmap<std::pair<FrameworkID, TaskID>, Task*> tasks; // Before. > > hashmap<FrameworkID, hashmap<TaskID, Task*> > tasks; // After. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/master/master.hpp bd5cb1ff05967518d7dc7f3a9dc0d32c22eb9643 > src/master/master.cpp a49b17ef43fca5b385a89731ca8776a26b61399a > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14438/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > make check > > > Thanks, > > Ben Mahler > >
