-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20127/#review39808
-----------------------------------------------------------



3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/os.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/20127/#comment72437>

    Can we return Try<int> for descriptive (hard coded) error messages and 
remain async signal safe? If not, perhaps document this so someone else doesn't 
add it later :-)



3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/os.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/20127/#comment72440>

    standard system() just returns the exit status of the shell, whatever that 
may be.



3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/tests/os_tests.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/20127/#comment72438>

    what about testing the failure path in the child?
    
    EXPECT_EQ(-1, os::system("invalid.command.that.should.not.be.found"));


- Ian Downes


On April 8, 2014, 6:16 p.m., Jie Yu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/20127/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 8, 2014, 6:16 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Ben Mahler and Ian Downes.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/os.hpp db5ae69 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/tests/os_tests.cpp d61db30 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20127/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jie Yu
> 
>

Reply via email to