In general, I think it's okay to ship some features that are 'alpha' or even incomplete. Rather than reverting the commit I wonder if it would be better just to call out these features as such.
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Vinod Kone <vinodk...@gmail.com> wrote: > Lets revert the following commit because authorization is not ready yet and > exposing the "acls" flag will be misleading. > > commit 0dda8220396fbb788f25a0f08dd3ab39e6879bd9 > > Author: Vinod Kone <vi...@twitter.com> > > Date: Fri May 16 14:37:28 2014 -0700 > > > Integrate Authorizer into Master. > > > > Review: https://reviews.apache.org/r/21723 > > > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Tom Arnfeld <t...@duedil.com> wrote: > > > Hey Ben, > > > > When’s the vote going out? I’m in the process of deploying 0.19.0-rc1 > (and > > testing with Deimos) to our pre-production cluster to see how it goes… > will > > report back if I find anything odd. > > > > Tom. > > > > On 30 May 2014, at 17:48, Benjamin Mahler <benjamin.mah...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > I've pushed a tag for the first release candidate for 0.19.0: > 0.19.0-rc1 > > > > > > I would like to ask others to assist in testing this candidate so that > > we can catch anything obvious before the vote! > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Ben > > > > >
