-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22064/#review45553
-----------------------------------------------------------


Bad patch!

Reviews applied: [22064]

Failed command: git apply --index 22064.patch

Error:
 error: patch failed: src/linux/cgroups.hpp:40
error: src/linux/cgroups.hpp: patch does not apply
error: patch failed: src/linux/cgroups.cpp:1670
error: src/linux/cgroups.cpp: patch does not apply
error: patch failed: src/slave/containerizer/isolators/cgroups/cpushare.cpp:439
error: src/slave/containerizer/isolators/cgroups/cpushare.cpp: patch does not 
apply
error: patch failed: src/slave/containerizer/linux_launcher.cpp:271
error: src/slave/containerizer/linux_launcher.cpp: patch does not apply


- Mesos ReviewBot


On June 11, 2014, 11:31 p.m., Ian Downes wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/22064/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 11, 2014, 11:31 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Jie Yu.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Use a timeout to discard cgroups::destroy.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/linux/cgroups.hpp 21d87a0783c2edd653d28fa89c59773200ae647e 
>   src/linux/cgroups.cpp 142ac437d6d53b678ef284bda46444e1615ff0d1 
>   src/slave/containerizer/isolators/cgroups/cpushare.hpp 
> 909ea8802b3746b73aae8d62c8e49f259c471fd5 
>   src/slave/containerizer/isolators/cgroups/cpushare.cpp 
> 3d253af51677dcb4dc48dc9e01bdc2ba80847da9 
>   src/slave/containerizer/isolators/cgroups/mem.hpp 
> 362ebcfa2e16701b225deea0fbeb92e4a56d51aa 
>   src/slave/containerizer/isolators/cgroups/mem.cpp 
> 60013d4e840f6b1f131b796b95916d1978b37c70 
>   src/slave/containerizer/linux_launcher.cpp 
> c17724b138de9d64856fb85db019e52043fbc7af 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22064/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ian Downes
> 
>

Reply via email to